|
» Main Page » Center for Documentation » Results of Research » Seminars and Conferences » IISEPS Bulletins » Hot Analytics » Analytics Archives » Hot Data » Data Archives » Statistics » About IISEPS |
![]() |
|
| Analytics Archives |
WHAT DOES POPULATION THINK ABOUT ITS EXPENSES The polling data show that the expenditure pattern of the population is undergoing positive changes. In particular, running costs for groceries and apartment are decreasing. As it goes from Table 1, expenses for groceries have gone down fourfold and costs for apartment – 6.7-fold over the past two years. At the same time, expenses for leisure and domestic electric appliances as well as for education are going up. Although this growth is not very high, such change in the expenditure pattern can be recognized as positive. Table 1. Distribution of answers to the question "How was the income in your family allocated in the past year?", %
In general, the expenditure pattern of population still cannot be considered optimal. The Table 1 shows that running costs for groceries and apartment presently make 56.6%. (This figure is close to the average figure in Table 2 presenting answers to a direct question about these expenses.) Adding up expenses for the necessities, healthcare and transport will make the amount of urgent needs totaling to 80% which almost doesn’t leave free resources, i.e. chances to invest for the perspective. Table 2. Distribution of answers to the question "What part of your family’s income do you spend for groceries and public utilities?", %
Table 3 shows the data about expenses of the population. Thus, over 55% of respondents just can buy the minimum of groceries and clothes (almost 15% can hardly afford even this). Only 30% of respondents can afford high-quality groceries and clothes. Only 40% can afford buying basic electric appliances. High-quality modern electric appliances are available for 12.4% of respondents. Finally, only 1.2% of the polled can afford a new car and another 30.7% - a second-hand car. All the rest cannot afford even this. Slightly more than 6% of respondents said that they have possibilities to purchase an apartment so as to improve their living conditions due to many-year savings or with bank credits. Alongside, nearly 30% of respondents don’t have such a possibility despite urgent need in lodging. In other words, housing problem is still far from being settled in Belarus. Table 3. Distribution of answers to the question "What items can you afford buying?", %
To sum up, the expenditure pattern of the Belarusians is not optimal at the moment. Dominating are still the expenses for necessities of the first level. This points out to that the country presently doesn’t ensure the conditions necessary for internal growth of capital. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|